V.M.I. Haag
Transport and installation of Offshore Wind Turbines.
Literature survey,
Report 2003.TL.6789, Transport Engineering and Logistics.
Current onshore exploration of wind turbines is restricted due to transport
considerations. A possible solution to harvest wind energy is the installation
of wind energy converters at near or offshore locations.
The land-based development of the three bladed, upwind wind turbine
configuration has evolved into two distinct directions for wind energy
conversion: variable speed and direct drive.
The current status of technology for land-based turbines will be available
for offshore wind turbines. Several pilot projects have already been built
and the first commercial wind farms ar being commissioned off the cost of
Denmark.
Although the offshore wind regime is well suited to provide even better
conditions for wind energy conversion (low wind shear, less turbulence)
the practical implications of offshore installation and operation are
still very uncertain. In addition, offshore turbines will have to be able
to withstand the maritime conditions and show (highly) improved
reliability in comparison to the land-based concepts.
For the existing wind farms two methods of transport have been used to
transport the components to the location:
- Installation vessel is used for transport and installation. This will
have the advantage of 'one-stop-shopping' and single vessel
installation.
- A separate vessel is used for transport and will 'shuttle' between the
supply port and the installation site. Separating the transport and the
installation activities will enable the use of low-cost transport
vessels.
A longer-term objective should aim for an integrated design, where the
foundation and the turbine are transported and installed as one piece. The
installation procedure should at least be simplified and include a minimum
of operations offshore. Comparison of several possible installation
procedures shows a 'one-stop-shopping' concept to be the most effective
method of installing offshore wind turbines. The possibility to transport
and install a completed structure is the main focus for development.
Turbine availability is one of the most important parameters to be
considered in the design of an offshore turbine. It connects directly to
accessibility for maintenance and reliability.
Furthermore, maintenance and repair for offshore turbines will be far more
expensive in comparison to land-based installations because of reduced
serviceability.
Summary
Land-based
Virtually all wind turbines installed at present are based on one of three
main wind turbine types:
- Fixed speed with directly grid-coupled (asynchronous) squirrel cage
induction generator
- Variable speed with doubly fed induction generator
- Variable speed based on a direct drive synchronous generator.
For the near future, wind turbine development will focus on the three
bladed, upwind turbine configuration. The trend is towards advanced
designs, especially for wind turbines in the megawatt class. Currently,
the two trend-setting technological designs in this category (>1.5 MW)
are variable pitch turbines with doubly fed induction generators, and
direct drive systems. Both designs incorporate variable speed operation.
Turbine material usage is and will continue to be dominated by steel, but
opportunities exist for introducing aluminium or other lightweight
composites, provided strength and fatigue requirements can be met.
Increasing the use of offshore applications may partially offset this
trend in favour of the use of composites.
Wind power is gaining rapid momentum in the world energy balance. With it,
certain issues have to be addressed in order to upkeep reasonable power
quality in sub transmission and distribution networks more or less
dependent on wind power. Unless properly remedied, voltage fluctuations
may otherwise proliferate and become a nuisance to grid users as well as
operators.
No commercial turbine manufacturer uses high-voltage generators. There
would be advantages in studying the technology and the costs of
high-voltage generators (up to 35 kV) in volume production.
There is no indication that size will be limited in the near future by
technical boundaries or transport considerations, although increasing
component dimensions will add to project costs.
Although total assembly costs per turbine increase as the turbine sizes
increase, it was found that the assembly costs per installed kW did not
experience dramatic changes. The increased assembly effort associated with
larger land-based turbines does not appear to increase faster than the
power rating of the turbines.
Transport is limited by handling equipment and infrastructure, such as
bridge height and allowable surface loads. Normal transportation by road
or rail is possible for smaller components, for larger components it is
becoming an increasing problem. Some manufacturers make use of standard
containerized units for transport by sea, road and rail. Components can be
fitted with corner fittings or lifting frames.
Most turbine components, .normal. and oversized, can be handled with
conventional rigging and transport equipment. This includes specialized
equipment used for general heavy lift and oversized cargo handling and
transport. Road transport of oversized components is frequently carried
out at night.
Offshore
There is a growing interest in the expansion of offshore exploration of
wind energy. After several pilot projects, large-scale commercial wind
farms are being constructed and several are already operational. So why go
offshore?
An offshore wind environment will experience high wind speeds for longer
periods of time than an onshore location. Local wind speeds are often
significantly higher offshore than onshore because of the absence of
obstructions. The temperature difference between the sea surface and the
air above it is far smaller than the corresponding difference on land,
particularly during the daytime. This means that the wind is less
turbulent at sea than over land. This, in turn, will mean less turbulent
winds and lower mechanical fatigue load. Thus longer lifetime for turbines
located at sea rather than land can be achieved using the same turbine or
components.
Another argument in favour of offshore wind power is the generally smooth
surface of water. Wind shear above the surface of the sea is much lower
then above land.
Reduced wind shear and the costs involved in the support structure,
installation and maintenance, will lead to a lower optimum hub height at
sea in comparison to land-based turbine towers.
In offshore deployment, the relatively high cost of initial foundations
makes it imperative to maximize each foundation by installing the largest
possible turbines. Offshore wind farms will use the largest turbines
developed and proven for onshore use.
Up till now, operation in the offshore environment is limited to the
possible adaptation of land-based wind turbines. This means that extra
efforts are made with respect to sealing of bearings, avoiding salt water
or salt spray access to the cooling system or generator and gearbox, and
corrosion protection. Installation and maintenance procedures are also
modifications of the standard onshore practice.
A non-constant speed operation in an offshore environment is favourable
for the following reasons:
- Added compliance
- Lower structure loading
A non-constant speed operation can only be operated with an indirect grid
connection. An indirect connection will also enable the control of the
quality of power output to improve the power quality in the electrical
grid. This may be useful, particularly if a turbine is running on a weak
offshore electrical grid.
Furthermore, on European land based sites the maximum tip speed of wind
turbine blades is limited primarily by acoustic noise. Most machines of
the leading manufacturers have tip speed lower than 70 m/s although a few
machines, not generally market leaders, adopt high tip speeds above 100
m/s. Apart from acoustic considerations, a higher tip speed is
advantageous, implying lower torque for a given power rating and lighter
and cheaper tower top systems.
Support structure
Although offshore (sub-sea) structures are plentiful, the development of
support structures for offshore wind turbines is not considered a common
practice. The technology and design of foundations for the offshore
exploration of resources is both well developed and well established and
therefore there is a huge scope to draw on the accumulated knowledge
within the existing practice of offshore technology.
The support structure will be typically designed on a case specific basis.
Local conditions will determine loading and demands for fatigue
resistance. Therefore support structures will differ for similar size
turbines at different locations. It is unlikely that one foundation will
be suitable for all situations.
Recent studies determined the piled tripod as being the lightest
structure, due to the light foundation piles. However, fabrication of the
tripod is likely to be more costly than the monopile and requires more
space during transport and handling.
The gravity base structure is more difficult to compare with the other
structures, due to the very different type of material and manufacturing
process. However, it must be noted that gravity base designs are very case
and site specific and this conclusion is not generic. Furthermore,
installation, seabed preparation, scour-protection and non-technical
issues also differ significantly from those of the steel structures.
It was concluded that the support structure of the monopile type combined
with wind turbines up to about 3 MW offers superior performance at
demanding Southern North Sea environments with water depths up to 20 m
(LAT) and firm soil conditions. Beyond this turbine size, for greater water
depth, weaker soils or even more exposed sites other support structure
concepts are probably required.
Offshore wind farming
Recent studies concluded: Using a larger scale wind farm does not
influence the absolute minimum cost level for which electricity can be
produced at prime sites in a significant way. Instead, the benefit offered
by large-scale offshore wind energy converters (OWECS) is the greater
proportion of sites available for lower cost levels. Therefore
exploitation of the sites with superior performance can start on a near to
medium time scale based on mature 'megawatt technology'. For an
utilisation in the range of (tens of) gigawatt on a longer time scale,
development of multi-megawatt technology may offer advantages. The optimum
size for an offshore farm today appears to be 100 MW or above. There is no
limit to farm size other then the available sites on a given location with
respect to water depth and soil conditions, and the individual turbine
distance or spacing.
There are several vessel types available for the installation and
transport of offshore turbines and components. These are almost all
designed for conventional offshore work. A predominant issue with respect
to cost seems to be lifting height. The cheaper equipment of the floating
sheer legs and self-elevating platform types seems to be no longer
available above approximately 85 m hoist height and this can have its
impact on the economic viability of certain design concepts.
For the existing wind farms two methods of transport have been used to
transport the components to the location:
- Installation vessel is used for transport and installation. This will
have the advantage of 'one-stop-shopping' and single vessel installation.
- A separate vessel is used for transport and will 'shuttle' between the
supply port and the installation site. Separating the transport and the
installation activities will enable the use of low-cost transport vessels.
The following assumptions can be made with respect to transport and
offshore installations of wind turbines:
- Where possible, transport of components to a supply port should make use
of water-based transport to avoid being limited in size by onshore handling
and transport equipment.
- Pre-assembly will facilitate installation. Pre-assembled turbines and
components allow testing and commissioning before installation. A
longer-term objective should aim for an integrated design, where the
foundation and the turbine are transported and installed as one piece. The
installation procedure should at least be simplified and include a minimum
of operations offshore. For the near future, this will focus on optimizing
separate installation of support and superstructure.
- An offshore wind farm requires much closer integration of the design and
construction activities than an onshore wind farm because of the additional
challenges of operating at sea. Using a dedicated installation vessel can
make significant time and cost savings.
- The total build duration for a multi-unit wind farm is likely to take
several months. All installation operations will be subject to weather
constraints and there will inevitably be periods of non-operation/weather
down-time.
- The highest uncertainty in offshore installations relates to time delays
and costs in use of rented equipment. Also, it is important to minimise
the time needed for offshore operations as any unscheduled downtime. There
is a need for installation vessels that can withstand more severe weather
conditions and operate for longer periods of the year.
A comparison showed the one-stop-shopping concept to be the most effective
method of installing offshore wind turbines. The possibility to transport and
install a completed structure is the main focus for development of a PUFO
(Pick-up and Float-over) installation concept.
Availability
Onshore wind turbines are now enjoying availability levels in excess of 97%
with appropriate routine servicing and responsive maintenance actions. Recent
studies concluded that O&M strategy should be optimised with respect to
localised energy production costs rather than pure capital or O&M costs.
Further, the availability of offshore wind turbines with commercial offshore
wind turbines without significantly improved reliability and without optimised
operation and maintenance solution may be unacceptably low, e.g. 70% or less.
Turbine availability is one of the most important parameters to be considered
in the design of an offshore turbine. O&M demands will impact considerably
on costs of offshore wind turbine systems and affect optimum scale for minimum
cost of energy Furthermore, maintenance and repair for offshore turbines will
be far more expensive in comparison to land-based installations because of
reduced serviceability.
Developments in offshore wind energy
One of the main issues to be addressed in future offshore wind exploration
is the location of wind farms further offshore. Public demand in coastal
communities and better wind conditions are forcing wind farm developers to
move beyond the horizon.
Although a genuine integrated approach will most likely produce an
innovative design solution, the evolutionary nature of technical progress
and the commercial risks inherent to innovative solutions must be kept in
mind.
The main issues can be summarised as follows:
- Structural dynamics and combined wind and wave loading. Integration of
wind and wave loading into the structural dynamics codes is necessary to
avoid overdesign.
- Translating the absence of noise emission constraints (tip speeds of
rotors can be higher, leading to smaller transmission ratios and lighter
drive trains) and lower turbulence intensities into relative cheap
constructions.
- Development of dedicated offshore concepts.
Wind turbines manufacturers - who have been accumulating considerable
experience with the manufacturing and operation of land-based MW+ sized
wind turbines, are now developing offshore turbines. Two routes are to be
distinguished in their work:
- Using land turbine concepts and modifying them, so they are suitable to
operate offshore (until now in shallow waters);
- The development of purpose-built offshore designs for installation at
greater water depths (15 - 20 m).
Reports on Transport Engineering and Logistics (in Dutch)
Modified: 2003.10.20;
logistics@3mE.tudelft.nl
, TU Delft
/ 3mE
/ TT
/ LT.